I don't know if nuclear weapons will be used soon; but it's my understanding that having a WORKING nuclear arsenal requires in-house expertise and the support of a complex infrastructure. With the challenges of collapse accelerating this year and beyond for the next 5 to 10 years what will happen to complex infrastructure and in-house expertise? A country with low resources and options could rapidly lose the ability to maintain a nuclear arsenal. It's difficult to predict how a country like Pakistan will react to loss of a military deterrent--primarily to deter India, I suppose. But India will be having plenty of collapse problems too. Will countries just "crazy nuke" each other? What would be the gain? Promoting "radical acceptance" as you are doing would give countries a better road map about what is happening. Nuking your neighbor won't be a solution. Launching nukes would just be an action of spite with no gain.